<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We are all Victims!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skeptic.dk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skeptic.dk/?p=108</link>
	<description>In Love with Alteration...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:12:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malene</title>
		<link>http://skeptic.dk/?p=108&#038;cpage=1#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>Malene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeptic.dk/?p=108#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>Hi London,

Thank you so much for stopping by! ;-) 
And thank you for your compliment, I do very much appreciate it (and I really hope, you got my message, I keep getting those error messages from the tribe every time I try to do anything but post topics)

But I think, I must warn you, that my posts are not exactly representative for the environment on the tribe. I do get some rather harsh feedback in messages from people who do not approve of my perception. But all things considered it is probably the most lenient forum towards new ideas.

I can also recommend empathcommunity.ning.com, if you want to dig further into the empath communities. There is a great deal of activity at least, and in many ways there are different approaches to the empath ability. Elise, who created the community, has her own &quot;program&quot; for new empaths, which I largely disagree with (and the way new people are being more or less indoctrinated by the perceptions arrived from it), but other than that it is actually ok. 

Again, Thank you!

- Malene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi London,</p>
<p>Thank you so much for stopping by! <img src='http://skeptic.dk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
And thank you for your compliment, I do very much appreciate it (and I really hope, you got my message, I keep getting those error messages from the tribe every time I try to do anything but post topics)</p>
<p>But I think, I must warn you, that my posts are not exactly representative for the environment on the tribe. I do get some rather harsh feedback in messages from people who do not approve of my perception. But all things considered it is probably the most lenient forum towards new ideas.</p>
<p>I can also recommend empathcommunity.ning.com, if you want to dig further into the empath communities. There is a great deal of activity at least, and in many ways there are different approaches to the empath ability. Elise, who created the community, has her own &#8220;program&#8221; for new empaths, which I largely disagree with (and the way new people are being more or less indoctrinated by the perceptions arrived from it), but other than that it is actually ok. </p>
<p>Again, Thank you!</p>
<p>- Malene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: London</title>
		<link>http://skeptic.dk/?p=108&#038;cpage=1#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeptic.dk/?p=108#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>Biologically, we cannot be &quot;in protection&quot; and &quot;in love&quot; at the same time - the immune system cannot do that. So... I think nature agrees with you :-) 

Protection is certainly ok as we need it - that IS personally directed. But to advise people to consider their belief (and, thus, their perception) that they must necessarily be a victim of themselves is only compassionate. So I don&#039;t know what to say to you except...good job. You made the most luminous point (in my perception) that I have seen giving me a great introduction to the empathsalike.com environment.

Be well.
London</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biologically, we cannot be &#8220;in protection&#8221; and &#8220;in love&#8221; at the same time &#8211; the immune system cannot do that. So&#8230; I think nature agrees with you <img src='http://skeptic.dk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Protection is certainly ok as we need it &#8211; that IS personally directed. But to advise people to consider their belief (and, thus, their perception) that they must necessarily be a victim of themselves is only compassionate. So I don&#8217;t know what to say to you except&#8230;good job. You made the most luminous point (in my perception) that I have seen giving me a great introduction to the empathsalike.com environment.</p>
<p>Be well.<br />
London</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
